Skip to main content

Table 3 Prostate and lung cancer incidence trends, age-standardized, by world standard population, among men, by Health Region in the state of Mato Grosso, Brazil, 2001–2018

From: Trend in cancer incidence in Mato Grosso and its health regions, Brazil, 2001–2018

Health Region

Prostate Cancer

AAPC (95%CI)

Lung Cancer

Trends 1

Trends 2

Trends 3

Trends 4

Trends 1

Period

APC (95%CI)

Period

APC (95%CI)

Period

APC (95%CI)

Period

APC (95%CI)

Period

AAPC (95%CI)

Alto Tapajós

2001–2016

4,2(-3,1;12,1)

2016–2018

-72,4(-95,1;55,6)

-

-

-

-

-10,9(-26,6;8,2)

-

-

Baixada Cuiabana

2001–2012

0,8(-1,9;3,5)

2012–2018

-11,0*(-16,8; -4,9)

-

-

-

-

-3,5*(-6,1; -1,0)

2001–2018

-2,4*(-3,8; -0,9)

Garças Araguaia

2001–2003

98,5*(20,1;228,3)

2003–2016

3,4*(0,4;6,5)

2016–2018

-49,5*(-69,4; -16,4)

-

-

2,6(-4,9;10,8)

2001–2018

-3,8*(-6,5; -1,0)

West

2001–2014

4,9(-0,2;10,1)

2014–2018

-25,5(-44,6;0,2)

-

-

-

-

-3,2(-9,9;4,0)

2001–2018

-2,1(-5,5;1,5)

North

2001–2014

5,2(-0,8;11,6)

2014–2018

-21,8(-45,2;11,6)

-

-

-

-

-1,9(-10,0;7,0)

2001–2018

1,0(-4,3;6,7)

North Center

2001–2018

0,4(-3,4;4,3)

-

-

-

-

-

-

0,4(-3,4;4,3)

2001–2018

-3,1(-7,6;1,7)

Vale do Arinos

2001–2018

-1(-5,6;3,9)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-1,0(-5,6;3,9)

-

-

Northwest

2001–2018

2,8(-1,8;7,6)

-

-

-

-

-

-

2,8(-1,8;7,6)

2001–2018

-3,6(-7,8;0,7)

Vale do Peixoto

2001–2018

-0,8(-5,2;3,9)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-0,8(-5,2;3,9)

2001–2018

1,6(-2,5;5,9)

Southwest

2001–2015

9,9*(4,6;15,4)

2015–2018

-45,6*(-67,8; -8)

-

-

-

-

-2,9(-11,4;6,4)

-

-

South

2001–2006

15,2*(5,8;25,4)

2006–2009

-12,6(-40,1;27,7)

2009–2012

29,9(-11,1;89,7)

2012–2018

-9,5*(-15,1; -3,5)

2,9(-5,3;11,9)

2001–2018

-0,9(-3,1;1,4)

Teles Pires

2001–2005

16,7(-7,9;47,8)

2005–2008

-24,7(-64,3;58,9)

2008–2015

5,6(-6,9;19,8)

2015–2018

-23,3(-47,2;11,4)

-3,7(-16,1;10,4)

2001–2018

-0,2(-3,2;3,0)

Middle North

2001–2015

5,5*(1,2;10,1)

2015–2018

-32,7(-57;5,5)

-

-

-

-

-2,5(-9,9;5,4)

2001–2018

-2,4(-4,7;0,0)

  1. *APC or AAPC values were considered statistically significant if p < 0.05. For rates equal to zero, calculation of the trend was not possible, and such instances are indicated with a dash (‘-‘) in the table